The University of Sheffield
Town and Regional Planning

Deepak Gopinath

Research interests

Deepak Gopinath

Governance and the politics of development in the Global South, inter-disciplinary research on poverty, comparative studies in the planning of mega-cities, Kerala's development experience, environmental resource management, South Asia.

Qualifications

Experience

Title of Ph.D.

Governance practice in Kerala: developing an empirical understanding

Supervisors:

Abstract of PhD

This research set out to explore governance practice in Kerala starting with the Peoples' Plan Campaign (1996-2001) to the Integrated District Development Plan model (2001-2006). From literature, two issues were identified. Firstly, there have been contesting claims on what a particular governance arrangement set out to do. This raised questions on whether there were gaps between rhetoric and reality. Secondly, most literature examined the PPC alone - through assessment studies on one hand, and in theorising the PPC as the new 'Kerala model' on the other. Thus, there appeared to be gap in current understanding of why the IDDP emerged as an alternative to the PPC. Unfortunately, there has been limited investigation in this regard, except that the shift from the PPC to the IDDP has been due to changing political establishments in the state legislature. That might well be one of the reasons, but it appeared to provide a limited understanding of different factors that might shape governance practice in Kerala.

This then required the building of an empirical understanding of governance practice in Kerala. Empirical evidence was collected through fieldwork and detailed analysis was carried out. The inside story of governance practice seems to throw up a few surprises and brought out significant gaps between rhetoric and reality. But more interestingly, it emerged that such gaps were influenced by different factors that shaped governance practice in Kerala (including the transition from the PPC to the IDDP). In particular, these factors were embedded in tensions, of who decides on governance; and which seems to be manifested in competing discourses and practices, around who should be involved in policy making. Further, these competing discourses and practices seem to be drawing on, from Kerala's history and culture, where tension had existed between an exclusively elitist approach, and a more inclusive participatory approach.

Membership

Member of Development Studies Association (UK), Association of British Scholars in India, Council of Architecture (India)