UK productivity – still no sign of recovery
Professor Richard Jones, Pro-Vice-Chancellor for Research and Innovation, was interviewed on BBC Breakfast today (Friday 8 April) at the University's Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre (AMRC) with Boeing discussing the government's latest figures for labour productivity.
The October–December 2015 figures show a gloomy picture, with the UK on track for the worst decade of productivity in a century.
Colin Sirett, the AMRC's Chief Executive Officer, also explained how the AMRC supports businesses in developing new manufacturing techniques and technologies to improve productivity.
Comment: UK productivity – still no sign of recovery
By Professor Richard Jones, posted 8 April 2016 on Richard Jones’ Soft Machines blog.
The UK's Office of National Statistics today released the latest figures for labour productivity, to the end of 2015. This shows that the apparent recovery in productivity that seemed to be getting going half way through last year was yet another false dawn; productivity has flat-lined since the financial crisis, with the Q4 2015 value actually below the peak achieved in 2007.
This performance puts us on track for the worst decade in a century. Poor productivity growth translates directly into stagnating living standards and lower tax revenues for the government, meaning that, despite austerity, all their efforts to eliminate the fiscal deficit will be in vain.
As this is perhaps the most serious economic problem currently facing the UK, it’s good to see the issue becoming more widely discussed. It’s an issue I’ve been thinking about for some time; my post on the political implications of the productivity slowdown, as revealed by this March’s budget and its aftermath, is here: The political fallout of the UK’s productivity problem. Last summer, I wrote a series of blogposts exploring the origins of this productivity slowdown. I’ve written a draft paper based on a substantially revised and updated version of those posts:
Views posted in comment articles are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the University of Sheffield.