Academic Appeals Procedure and Case Review

A thumbnail of a flowchart depicting the Academic Appeals procedurePurpose

To allow all students (both taught and research) to apply for a reconsideration of a recommended grade for any module or degree classification or examination.


The student needs to be able to show that either there has been a procedural error or that there is new evidence concerning mitigating circumstances that was not made available to the examiners and could not have been produced at an earlier stage.

Appeals will not be considered against the academic judgement of the examiners or in respect of the quality of teaching or supervision prior to the examination unless the student could not reasonably have been expected to have made this a subject of a complaint before the examination.

Representations may be made where students do not accept departmental action taken against them where they have been found to have used unfair means in the assessment process.


The student must apply in writing within 15 working days of the publication of the exam results (30 working days for a graduate research student). If the Faculty Officer finds that there is a substantive case they will either determine that the appeal be upheld or refer the matter to an Academic Appeals Committee where it will be dealt with in accordance with the established procedures (involving a reopening of the issues originally dealt with by the examiners). Notes of guidance for staff attending meetings will be sent out in advance.

Review Mechanism

If a student is not satisfied with a decision taken in respect of an academic appeal, they may use the final stage of the Complaints Procedure (see menu) and submit a Case Review Request Form requesting that their case be reviewed by a Pro-Vice-Chancellor on one or more of the following grounds:

  1. that there was a material procedural irregularity which rendered the process leading to the decision taken in respect of the formal complaint or academic appeal unfair;
  2. that material which the student could not reasonably have been expected to produce at the time of the decision taken in respect of the formal complaint or academic appeal casts substantial doubt upon the appropriateness of that decision;
  3. that the decision taken in respect of the formal complaint or academic appeal was manifestly unreasonable.


Appeals: Student Engagement & Progress Team

Case Reviews: Student Conduct & Appeals Team

Advice for Students

The Student Advice Centre can give independent advice to a student on their position. In addition, they have a suite of self-help pages on how to lodge an Academic Appeal, which contain clear explanations for the meanings of specific grounds, and what happens after a student submits an Academic Appeal. We would appreciate your assistance in pointing students who may be considering submitting an Academic Appeal to these pages; and reminding them that should they need further guidance after reading the pages, they can contact the Advice Centre for an appointment with an academic adviser.


Click on the General Regulations relating to Academic Appeals for the relevant academic year in the University Calendar.


Procedures for the Conduct of Appeals


Other Information