Dr Stef Pukallus
Tel: (+44)(0)114 222 4256
Office hours: by appointment
BA (Potsdam/Paris XII), MA (Paris III), MA (Paris XII), PhD (Sheffield), SFHEA
Stef is a lecturer at the department and co-director of research at the Centre for Freedom of the Media (CFOM) at the University of Sheffield. She is course leader for MA Global Journalism. She also co-chairs the Faculty of Social Sciences Early Career Researcher Forum and is a senior fellow of the Higher Education Academy.
She is part of the international team of historians writing the third volume of the official European Commission history entitled 'The European Commission, 1986-2000: History and Memories'. Her chapter focuses on the European Commission's public communication strategy and programmes, the monitoring and measuring of EU public opinion and the Spokesman's Service. She is also part of the Oral History Team at the European University Institute (EUI) in Florence.
Stef was a short-term visiting research fellow at the Alcide de Gasperi Centre on the History of European integration at the EUI in January 2017.
Stef has also acted as a consultant for the European Commission on communicating a European civil narrative to European citizens. She has worked for both the press office and the bureau for public campaigns at the French Ministry of Economy. At the former she was responsible for press relations and at the latter she was involved in the development and public communication of various national campaigns.
Stef's research interests are twofold. She specialises in how the European Community has developed and publicly communicated civil values and policies since 1951 in an attempt to stimulate and facilitate the emergence of a European civil society. She is currently working on a research monograph entitled 'Fabulous Artificers: The Building of Civil Europe 1951-1972'.
Related to CFOM's current research agenda, she is also interested in comparative approaches to media freedom and how it is politically, culturally, legally, socially and institutionally challenged across the world. One aspect of this is research into the politics of impunity and into the scope, implementation and relevance of the UN Plan of Action on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity as regards local contexts. The other aspect concerns the role of the factual mass media in post-conflict reconstruction contexts as a means for civil repair.
Stef strongly believes that students should be able to develop a capacity for analytical thought which spans both practical and theoretical outlooks. To that end she deploys a variety of teaching methods ranging from lectures, dynamic seminars and one-to-one discussions to designing communication strategies and political campaigns with small groups.
She says: "My view is simple and straightforward: we should engage with students via a variety of teaching strategies and encourage and value their contribution to complex debates and intellectual discussion at all times. Above all I enjoy teaching and the opportunity it provides me with to interact with very smart undergraduates and postgraduates, both inside the 'classroom' and outside formal settings."
For her module Reporting the European Union she won the 2016/17 Teaching Excellence in Social Sciences award for Outstanding Practice in Learning and Teaching.
- Pukallus S (forthcoming 2019) The Building of Civil Europe 1951-1972, under contract
- Pukallus S (2016) Representations of European Citizenship since 1951. Palgrave Macmillan. View this article in WRRO
- Harrison JL & Pukallus S (2015) The European Community's Public Communication Policy 1951-1967. Contemporary European History, 24(2), 233-251. View this article in WRRO
- Pukallus S & Harrison J () The Politics of Impunity: a study of journalists’ experiential accounts of impunity in Bulgaria, Democratic Republic of Congo, India, Mexico and Pakistan. Journalism. View this article in WRRO
- Pukallus S & Harrison J (2015) If media freedom and media pluralism are fundamental values in the European Union why doesn't the European Union do anything to ensure their application?, Comparative Perspectives on the Fundamental Freedom of Expression (pp. 368-387). View this article in WRRO