Jane Hughes

All publications

Journal articles

• Sampson FC, Hughes J, Long J, Buykx P & Snooks H (2022) PP39 Emergency service provider perspectives of feasibility and acceptability of emergency services distribution of take home naloxone. Emergency Medicine Journal, 39(9), e5.33-e5.33.
• Hughes J, Sampson FC, Long J, Buykx P & Snooks H (2022) EP12 Emergency services provision of take home naloxone to people at risk of opiate overdose: perspectives of potential recipients – a qualitative study. Emergency Medicine Journal, 39(9), e5.4-e5.4.
• Jones G, Brown Hajdukova E, Hanna E, Duncan R, Gough B, Hughes J, Hughes D, Ashworth F, Prevot J, Drabwell J , Solis L et al (2021) It’s long-term, well it’s for life basically: Understanding and exploring the burden of immunoglobulin treatment in patients with primary immunodeficiency disorders. Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare, 4(3), 117-131. View this article in WRRO
• Jones M, Bell F, Benger J, Black S, Buykx P, Dixon S, Driscoll T, Evans B, Edwards A, Fuller G , Goodacre S et al (2020) Protocol for Take-home naloxone In Multicentre Emergency (TIME) settings: feasibility study. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 6(1). View this article in WRRO
• Rooney G, Aber A, Phillips P, Hughes J, Keetharuth AD, Walters S, Jone G & Michaels J (2020) Electronic personal assessment questionnaire for vascular patients (ePAQ-VAS) development and validity. British Journal of Surgery. View this article in WRRO
• Wickramasekera N, Howard A, Philips P, Rooney G, Hughes J, Wilson E, Aber A, Michaels J & Shackley P (2019) Strength of public preferences for endovascular or open aortic aneurysm repair. British Journal of Surgery, 106(13), 1775-1783. View this article in WRRO
• Mahmoodi N, Bekker HL, King NV, Hughes J, Jones GL & Team CFMR (2018) Are publicly available internet resources enabling women to make informed fertility preservation decisions before starting cancer treatment: An environmental scan? 11 Medical and Health Sciences 1117 Public Health and Health Services. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18(1). View this article in WRRO
• Vogt KS, Hughes J, Wilkinson A, Mahmoodi N, Skull J, Wood H, McDougall S, Slade P, Greenfield DM, Pacey A , Ledger W et al (2018) Preserving fertility in women with cancer (PreFer): Decision‐making and patient‐reported outcomes in women offered egg and embryo freezing prior to cancer treatment. Psycho-Oncology.
• Jones G, Hughes J, Mahmoodi N, Smith E, Skull J & Ledger W (2017) What factors hinder the decision-making process for women with cancer and contemplating fertility preservation treatment?. Human Reproduction Update, 23(4), 433-457.
• Jones GL, Hughes J, Mahmoodi N, Greenfield D, Brauten-Smith G, Skull J, Gath J, Yeomanson D, Baskind E, Snowden JA , Jacques RM et al (2017) Observational study of the development and evaluation of a fertility preservation patient decision aid for teenage and adult women diagnosed with cancer: the Cancer, Fertility and Me research protocol. BMJ Open, 7(3). View this article in WRRO
• Jones GL, Jacques RM, Thompson J, Wood HJ, Hughes J, Ledger W, Alazzam M, Radley SC & Tidy JA (2016) The impact of surgery for vulval cancer upon health-related quality of life and pelvic floor outcomes during the first year of treatment: a longitudinal, mixed methods study. Psycho-Oncology, 25(6), 656-662. View this article in WRRO
• MacInnes E, Erskine S, Collins K, Hughes J, Wilkinson J, Haines R, Cook J & Wyld L (2012) 141. Factors influencing risk management choices (risk reducing surgery or screening) in women at high familial breast cancer risk. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 38(9), 778-779.
• Erskine S, Surgey E, Collins K, Hughes J, Wilkinson J, Haines D, Cooke J & Wyld L (2010) Psychosocial and physical outcomes for women at high familial breast cancer risk. European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO), 36(11), 1107-1107.
• Jones GL, Moss RH, Darby F, Mahmoodi N, Phillips B, Hughes J, Vogt KS, Greenfield DM, Brauten-Smith G, Gath J , Campbell T et al () Cancer, Fertility and Me: Developing and Testing a Novel Fertility Preservation Patient Decision Aid to Support Women at Risk of Losing Their Fertility Because of Cancer Treatment. Frontiers in Oncology, 12.

Conference proceedings papers

• Jones GL, Vogt K, Darby F, Mahmoodi N, Hughes J, Greenfield D, Skull J, Lane S, Brauten-Smith G, Yeomanson D , Baskind NE et al (2018) Experience of developing and evaluating a fertility preservation patient decision aid for teenage and adult women with cancer for use in oncology settings, UK (The Cancer, Fertility and Me study). PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, Vol. 27 (pp 45-45)
• MacInnes E, Erskine S, Collins K, Hughes J, Wilkinson J, Cook J, Walters S & Wyld L (2018) Experiences of women and partners of women at increased familial breast cancer risk: A qualitative study of the impact upon partnerships. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 44(6) (pp 904-905)
• MacInnes E, Erksine S, Collins K, Hughes J, Wilkinson J, Cook J, Walters S & Wyld L (2018) Views and experiences of MRI breast screening in women at increased familial breast cancer risk. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 44(6) (pp 905-906), 18 June 2018 - 19 June 2018. View this article in WRRO
• Jones G, Hughes J, Mattick E, Poku E, Mahmoodi N, Skull J & Ledger W (2016) What factors influence the decision-making process for women with cancer contemplating fertility preservation? A systematic review. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Vol. 123 (pp 70-71)

Other

• Wickramasekera N, Howard A, Philips P, Rooney G, Hughes J, Wilson E, Aber A, Michaels J & Shackley P (2020) Author response to: Comment on: Strength of public preferences for endovascular or open aortic aneurysm repair. British Journal of Surgery, 107(5), 613-614.