The PRIEST Study:
Pandemic Respiratory Infection Emergency System Triage
Respiratory infections, such as influenza or the corona virus, affect the lungs and airways, causing symptoms including fever, sore throat, coughing and breathing difficulties. If a new strain of the virus becomes widespread across many countries, this can be classified as a pandemic. During a pandemic, more patients attend hospital services and require investigation or admission, which puts a huge strain on the NHS.
Patients who contact emergency services (via NHS 111, 999 ambulance services or emergency departments) with a suspected pandemic respiratory infection need to be rapidly assessed to determine the severity of their illness, and whether they need to be admitted to hospital. This process is called "triage". Triage often uses methods such as scores or decision rules. These have been developed and are ready for use in a pandemic, but we don’t know how well they can correctly predict who needs to be admitted to hospital, and who does not.
We aim to:
- Optimise the triage of people using the emergency care system with suspected respiratory infections during a pandemic
- Identify the most accurate triage method for predicting severe illness among patients attending the emergency department with suspected respiratory infection
Our specific objectives after the pandemic are:
- To determine the discriminant value of emergency department triage methods for predicting severe illness in patients presenting with suspected pandemic respiratory infection
- To determine the discriminant value of presenting clinical characteristics and routine tests for identifying severe illness
- To determine the independent predictive value of presenting clinical characteristics and routine tests for severe illness
- To develop new triage methods based upon presenting clinical characteristics alone or presenting clinical characteristics, electrocardiogram (ECG), chest X-ray and routine blood test results, depending upon the data available and the predictive value of variables evaluated in objective 3
The PRIEST Study Method
The PRIEST study uses patient data from the early phases of a respiratory infection pandemic, such as COVID-19, to test how well existing triage methods predict serious complications. The study will also identify cases where the triage methods did not predict serious complications or recommended unnecessary hospital admission, and where possible modify triage methods or develop new triage methods that predict serious complications better than existing methods.
To do this, during a respiratory infection pandemic, we will be recording medical details in a standardised way from patients with suspected respiratory infection using a triage form. We will then use hospital records to follow these patients up to 30 days on to find out if they die or suffer a life-threatening complication.
We will evaluate triage methods used to determine whether a patient with suspected pandemic respiratory infection should be admitted to hospital or not, and whether they should be admitted to intensive or high dependency care. These may include the CURB-65 score, PMEWS, the swine flu hospital pathway, SMART-COP, the SwiFT score and any new methods developed before the next pandemic. We will also develop two new triage methods based upon (a) presenting clinical characteristics alone and (b) presenting clinical characteristics, electrocardiogram (ECG), chest X-ray and routine blood test results.
The results of this study can be used in the following stages of the pandemic, to produce a guideline or rule to help decide which patients would benefit from being admitted to hospital. The findings can also help doctors and nurses identify which individual patients may go on to develop serious complications. We may also be able to identify which patient characteristics are associated with a higher risk of serious complications, such as age or underlying health conditions. For example, in the 2009 influenza pandemic, it was found that pregnant patients, and those suffering from obesity, were at higher risk of developing complications.
The risks to patients involved in this study are very low, because the project will not involve any change to the way patients are assessed or treated. Information will be gathered in a way that aims to help doctors and nurses, and does not interfere with patient care. The way we collect information about patients has been tested during a winter flu season to confirm this.
Most personal details will be removed from information that leaves a hospital. We are only recording NHS numbers and ambulance incident numbers so that we can track how patients move through NHS services. Identifiable information, such as patient’s names, will only be available to hospital staff.
We will not be asking patients for written consent to use their data in the study because this could cause delays, which may be harmful in a pandemic. However, we will inform patients of the study, and let them know that they can remove their data if they wish.
Patients can contact one of the hospitals involved in the study to ask for their information to be removed from the study. This approach has worked well in previous studies, and was approved by an independent Research Ethics Committee and the Confidentiality Advisory Group of the Health Research Authority. If you are included in the study at a hospital a member of hospital staff will hand you an information leaflet ways you can opt out at the time, either by filling out the leaflet and handing it back or by contacting a local member of the research team.
For more information on your rights in the study please got to our PRIEST Privacy Notice.
This project is funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) Programme (project number 16/80/08). Any views or opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the HTA programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.
|Professor Steve Goodacre||ScHARR||Chief Investigator||+44 (0)114 222 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Dr Benjamin Thomas||ScHARR||Study Manager||+44 (0)114 22 email@example.com|
|Katie Biggs||ScHARR||CTRU Oversight||+44 (0)114 22 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Ellen Lee||ScHARR||Statistician||+44 (0) 114 222 email@example.com|
|Amanda Loban||ScHARR||Data Management||+44 (0) 114 222 firstname.lastname@example.org|
Project Management Group
|Dr Kirsty Challen||Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust||Consultant in Emergency Medicineemail@example.com|
|Dr Andrew Bentley||University Hospital of South Manchester||Critical Care Expertise||+44 (0)161 291 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Dr Darren Walter||University Hospital of South Manchester||Expert in Pandemic Emergency Planning||+44 (0)161 291 email@example.com|
|Dr Ian Maconochie||St Mary's Hospital, London||Expert in Paediatric Emergency Medicine||+44 (0)207 886 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Dr Chris Fitzsimmons||Sheffield Children's Hospital||Expert in Paediatric Emergency Medicine||+44 (0)114 271 email@example.com|
|Andrew Lee||ScHARR, The University of Sheffield||Senior Clinical University Teacher||+44 (0)114 222 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Fiona Lecky||ScHARR, The University of Sheffield||Principle Investigator||+44 (0)114 222 email@example.com|
|Tim Harris||Barts Health NHS Trust||Principle Investigatorfirstname.lastname@example.org|
|Sheffield Teaching Hospital||Professor Steve Goodacre|
|Sheffield Children's Hospital||Chris Fitzsimmons|
|Salford Royal||Fiona Lecky|
|York Teaching Hospital||Joanne Ingham|
|Scarborough General Hospital||Dr Richard Smith|
|The Royal London||Dr Ben Bloom|
|Wythenshawe||Dr Darren Walter|
|Barnsley||Dr Julian Humphrey|
|Northampton||Dr Tristan Dyer|
|Bristol (Royal & Children's)||Professor Johnathan Benger|
|Plymouth||Dr Simon Horne|
|Milton Keynes||Dr Peter Thomas|
|Royal Berkshire||Dr Liza Keating|
|Wirral||Dr Andrea Wootten|
|Dorset||Dr Tamsin Ribbons|
|Gloucestershire||Tanya De Weymarn|
|Shrewsbury||Dr Adrian Marsh|
|Northumbria||Dr Mark Harrison|
|North Staffordshire||Dr Richard Hall|
|Oxford||Dr Melanie Darwent|
|Harrogate||Dr Jen Lockwood|
|Edinburgh (Scotland)||Dr Alasdair Gray|
|Mid Essex||Dr Steve Jenkins|
|Newcastle||Dr John Wright|
|Paisley (Scotland)||Dr Alasdair Corfield|
|Manchester Royal & Children's||Dr Rick Body|
|Aintree||Dr Abdo Sattout|
|Coventry||Dr Ed Hartley|
|Nottingham||Dr Frank Coffey|
|Craigavon (Northern Ireland)||Lesley Ann Funston|
|Wexham Park||Dr Sarah Wilson|
|Newport (Wales)||Dr Ashkok Vaghela|
|Swindon||Dr Tim Slade|
|King's Lynn||Dr Nam Tong|
|Kings College Hospital, London||Dr Rob Pinate|
|Ashford and St Peter's||Dr Jessica Law|
|Norfolk and Norwich||Frank Sutherland|
|Lancashire||Dr Kirsty Challen|
|North Tees and Hartlepool||Ignacio Cardona|
|Epsom and St Helier||Rebecca MacFarlane|